Re: SiRPAC and parseType="Literal" -- bug report?

[Janne Saarela <jsaarela@w3.org>]

Hi Dan

Version 1.10 is now out and also installed on the online service.

There is some redundancy in the generation of namespace declarations
for markup within parseType="Literal" sections. I hope you can live
with it...

I'll get into the node vs. literal for the next release. Maybe we
could think it over one more time:

The items in the Triple would be instances of 'RDFtype',
'Resource', 'Property', or 'Literal' classes. The inheritance would
follow the set-theoretic definition of RDF M&S i.e.

parent(Resource,RDFtype)
parent(Property,Resource)
parent(Literal,RDFtype)
and later we can add more...

So one would effectively get 3-tuples
(Property,Resource,Literal) or
(Property,Resource,Resource)

right?

Janne
--
Janne Saarela           | Visiting scientist
Email: jsaarela@w3.org  | World Wide Web Consortium http://www.w3.org/